I'd love to see a counter opinion about the elderly being cruel to the young by saddling them with debt, the climate crisis, social security, tax breaks for the retired, etc. What's interesting is this article notes that these young people are "not caring" about a generation, but probably do care for individuals in the generation (e.g. their wlown grand parents). This somewhat amusingly reflects the case where individual grand parents are often very generous to particular youth, but not to the generation as a whole.

People should absolutely be taking the outbreak seriously, and I agree these young people are downplaying the severity. I just feel this article sets the stage so perfectly for a counter.

The article provides an example of what you're asking for:

> "To be perfectly honest, and this is awful, but to the young, watching as the elderly over and over and over choose their own interests ahead of Climate policy kind of feels like they’re wishing us to a death they won’t have to experience. It’s a sad bit of fair play."

I find the whole generational conflict bewildering. To me, blaming "the elderly" for "the climate crisis" and "saddling us with debt" seems stupid beyond words.

They do tend to vote for tire-burning candidates, on the whole.

I personally feel there's a sort of vicious circle going on between the social isolation of the elderly, the elderly consequently watching too much TV, then (on the whole) developing rather unfortunate political views.

You are just doing the same thing

The “elderly” and the “young” are not faceless masses but people with their own interests

There are more young voters than elderly voters and yet here we are still blaming previous generations

There are more female voters than male and yet not a single woman has been president

> There are more young voters than elderly voters

By most measures used by political scientists, that isn't really true.

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/04/03/millennials...

It’s not a particularly new nor surprising narrative. It is said that the elderly are typically ignored and abused in the West, especially in the US. Contrast that to how the elderly are treated in the Orient.

It depends on your definition of cruelty. Maybe to some, living with in-laws that despise you and leech off of you might be cruel. It’s all a matter of perspective.

What does it say about society in general when younger generations collectively despise older generations to the point were they don't care, even find it funny that they are under threat from a deadly virus. For too long old men haven't planted any trees they wont sit under, instead they've harvested the trees for short term profits to invest in their property portfolios.

Sure. That's why I see hordes of young people trying to reverse the "damage" the old generation has infliced upon the world. What I see is that most young people are self-centered A##oles.

> That's why I see hordes of young people trying to reverse the "damage" the old generation has infliced upon the world.

This, but unironically.

Young people shut down numerous cities protesting for action on climate change last year. Individually you have people like Boyan Slat. Young people do not have the political clout that the boomer generation has yet but they will in the next 20 or so years. That is why I'm hopeful for the future.

Even setting aside the possibility that some generational resentments should perhaps be taken seriously, this op-ed is really thin. The author's evidence for "a degree of cruelty that is truly staggering" is two social media posts. To this point I haven't seen much reason to think that the elderly are really being shunned in the current climate.

I think a lot could also be aimed not at seniors in rest homes, but seniors in congress, even on both sides of the aisle. Corona Virus and death in general doesn't differentiate by wealth or class, it comes for all equally if given a chance.

Many younger people and people on the left probably feel that this is the only chance to maybe even out some justice on capital hill, and in the elite structures of the world. Nobody wants people's grandma's to die...

Unless they are part of the gridlock problem in D.C., then maybe they could use at least an early retirement, we could definitely use less geriatrics running this country. Maybe we can be a better society if we set an age limit of 70 in public office.

I think part of this is normal coping humor.

A young person can feel conflicted between feelings of (a) relief that they are not in an endangered demographic, and (b) anxiety for people who are endangered and remaining self concern as they do not truly feel safe.

Oversimplifying the situation with humor (only older people need to worry, I am not old) temporarily releases some anxiety.

Dark humor does not necessarily reflect dark motives or values.

Taken too far it can become callous denial, also likely as a anxiety numbing strategy.

But most people just need a break from worry in a way that doesn’t harm anyone.

Treating the death of a young adult as several times more tragic than the death of an elderly adult is not a new phenomenon, nor is it irrational.

Now, laughing in an elderly person's face is obviously rude and unnecessary (although I won't necessary begrudge gallows humor as a coping mechanism.) But expecting people to treat the death of elderly people as seriously as the death of young people is unreasonable.

You know who else is anecdotally mistreated? Anyone. The brief piece builds its case on two anecdotes to claim general problems for a class of people.

What a crap premise. Had I a FB account, how long would it take for me to dredge up an anecdote or two like the author’s? Because that’s all the article is based on: two anecdotes, and then we’re off to the races of blame-placing and guilt. Ergo, I don’t have much of a response to the rest of the article. I mean, people can be assholes, don’t have to look far, nor across generational boundaries. No news there.

—

Not-Quite-Elderly

I suspect the author overheard gallows humor as a coping mechanism in a conversation he wasn’t a part of so he had no context. Or maybe he overheard a couple of jerks. Some percent of jerks exist in every generation. That said much of the lack of empathy in this comment section depresses me more than the two guys walking down the Upper West Side. I sincerely hope this young generation radically changes the world. All of you castigating an entire generation facing down an imminent threat to their lives - well you may find as you age that it’s not as easy as life goes on to break out of a system from within as it may appear.

Contrast this with reports like this one: "Frustrated millennials say they can’t get their aging parents to [...] take coronavirus seriously" https://www.businessinsider.sg/millennials-say-parents-wont-...

Like most things, it's probably over-reduction to attribute any given state of mind to every person born in a particular 20-year span.

If the author thinks overhearing some people saying old people will die soon in any case is “staggering, heartless cruelty”, he really needs to get out more.

I think millenials/gen z would love to have sympathy for the elderly or others in general, but they are caught up trying to have any future at all in today's world. It seems cruel, but nihilism and dark humor are great coping methods to avoid being overburdened by all the bad things we can do nothing about. Yes, the elderly may die a little sooner than they would've liked after living long and fulfilled lives. But the young people making these jokes are probably struggling with the idea that they may not even live half as long as "those boomers".