News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A human monoclonal 1 antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection by logicallee on Saturday March 14, 2020 @09:00AM (#22574967)
Your tone is really weird. No conspiracy is required in the case of a single company setting prices on its patented medical discoveries.

Since you're so critical of conspiracies, though, I'd (genuinely) love your take on something that does require a conspiracy:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/18/opinion/cost-insurance-di...

(For me the Google amp link brought up the full article.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/01/18/opin...

).

Without a conspiracy, what keeps any drug company from selling cheap generic insulin in the United States?

The reason I ask is that I really don't think so many companies can cooperate on price-fixing so I am looking for any other alternative explanation besides an illegal price-fixing conspiracy which I think would be very difficult to pull off among so many players and laws making it illegal.

But the comment you replied to isn't like that and doesn't require a conspiracy.

Re:A human monoclonal 1 antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection by cameldrv on Saturday March 14, 2020 @01:53PM (#22577117)
You might be surprised:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysine_price-fixing_conspira...

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/12/business/worldbusiness/12...

https://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/igamisugaya_1...

That’s just a few, and just the ones they caught. It’s very hard to prosecute this case, and the incentive to collude is huge.

Re:A human monoclonal 1 antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection by logicallee on Saturday March 14, 2020 @02:11PM (#22577293)
Interesting links! Thank you.