Re:Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in m...
by malandrew on Thursday March 12, 2020 @04:48PM
(#22561565)
The full text has not yet been published on congress.gov to verify who is paying and I can't find the full text elsewhere.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/341...
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6150...
However, the press release from Murray and DeLauro makes it sound like businesses are paying: https://www.help.senate.gov/ranking/newsroom/press/coronavir...
If you have a primary source that shows that government, not businesses, are paying for the costs of sick leave as it relates to S.3415 and HR.6150, please share it.
I also can't find a single search result that includes the term abortion as it relates to either S.3415 or HR.6150.
Re:Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in m...
by malandrew on Thursday March 12, 2020 @08:38PM
(#22563591)
It's honestly mindblowing that hacker news has reached the point where a comment asking for primary sources and evidence is downvoted.
Re:Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in m...
by so_tobeclear on Thursday March 12, 2020 @05:03PM
(#22561702)
Cheers
And all I could think was 'it's a PATRIOT act...'
Re:Fed to inject $1.5T to prevent ‘unusual disruptions’ in m...
by A4ET8a8uTh0 on Thursday March 12, 2020 @05:13PM
(#22561797)
Duh. Babies cost money and parents will do almost anything to keep it alive. Or at least bare minimum mandated by law. In either case, it is a sacrifice to the god of economy./$
The bill literally includes the funding to pay for sick leave. That's why it's a FUNDING bill - I think you're confused about who is being mislead by propaganda.
Meanwhile, the GOP is trying to insert language about abortion into the bill because...?