> What parts of the bill do you consider too much "social assistance"?

There is a sect in the USA that considers the social assistance already in place as too much no matter what. That's the mindset of the opposition here.

This isn't even a political hot take from me. It's an often-stated purpose.

That sect is frequently referred to as "the Republicans."

Not the parent, nor am I saying I agree with the parent. But I'm pretty sure the answer to your question is: "It also seeks to give workers new protections, including paid emergency leave, with both 14 days of paid sick leave and up to three months of paid family and medical leave, as well as enhanced unemployment insurance, which will extend protections to furloughed workers."

Testing means nothing if people then just go to work anyway because they can't stay home, whether to self quarantine or to care for family members and then self quarantine, without being fired.

No disagreement from me! Just trying to clarify what I believe the parent would have interpreted as "too much 'social assistance'" in case it wasn't obvious for some reason