Re:Covid-19 is now officially a pandemic, WHO says
by Cuuugi on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @01:58PM
(#22548327)
I don't understand what you think is to be saved by inciting panic. There's plenty of coverage, all this classification does is open up money from the IMF I believe. A Pandemic classification doesn't change most people's behaviors, but it does cause toilet paper/hand sanitizer shortages.
Re:Covid-19 is now officially a pandemic, WHO says
by rconti on Wednesday March 11, 2020 @03:14PM
(#22549330)
At least in the US, companies and other organizations are hesitant to be the first ones to stick their necks out and cancel events/encourage remote work. Our federal government's incompetent/evasive/opaque response to the crisis has let the burden fall on local governments in the hardest-hit areas.
Labeling this a pandemic would have given cover to organizations that wanted to be more cautious but were afraid of "looking stupid".
Modeling the causal impact of their criteria in light of data from the COVID-19 pandemic could reveal how different messaging strategies applied at different thresholds impact the spread of the virus.
The leadership could have done this months ago and estimated how proactive versus inactive quarantine efforts would impact morbidity. They have to know their role in persuading the public and government officials.
You don't have to stick to a rigid and inflexible criteria when thousands of human lives are at stake. When you define the criteria, you can also change them.