Re:Please re-add original author to docs and license
by asveikau on Monday March 09, 2020 @04:47PM
(#22529604)
The issue I might still have today in 2020 is disk space, and extra time downloading updates to those packages at the next update. Even today I'd be reluctant to want to pull in large libraries that amount to an entire UI or desktop framework just for one application, unless I have a really good justification to use that application.
I am also a tad displeased today at how many optional dependencies I don't use get pulled in by package managers on my systems.
Re:Please re-add original author to docs and license
by scarejunba on Monday March 09, 2020 @04:53PM
(#22529692)
At the time it was a big deal, you went all GTK or all KDE/QT and your desktop looked ugly if you didn't. Also everyone was obsessed with 'bloat' and KDE had that rep.
Re:Please re-add original author to docs and license
by ldng on Monday March 09, 2020 @10:22AM
(#22525546)
In KDE2 times ? Probably an issue with the licensing of QT at the time. It has changed one or two times since then.
Re:Please re-add original author to docs and license
by dharmab on Monday March 09, 2020 @08:48AM
(#22524916)
As another kid who got into Linux at the time, KDE and Qt had a reputation at the time for poor performance on low-cost hardware.
To give you an idea, my computer at the time was a used machine that was duct taped together and any fancy desktop would cut my battery life to about an hour. So out of necessity I was driven towards lighter weight software
Why are you so firmly opposed to libqt?