News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Websites have evolved back to static HTML/CSS/JS files by Mandatum on Monday March 09, 2020 @01:30AM (#22523196)
A management system my photographer friend can use without learning what "CLI" or "GitHub" are. They just login and make changes.
Re:Websites have evolved back to static HTML/CSS/JS files by indysigners on Monday March 09, 2020 @02:19AM (#22523375)
Yup, exactly that. WordPress editors (WYSIWYG and Gutenberg) are still far more user-friendly and mature than a Netlify CMS that still is buggy like hell and where many little details and YAML formattings need to be fixed in code editor. You really cannot expect such a thing to be done by a non-coding person.
Re:Websites have evolved back to static HTML/CSS/JS files by htgb on Monday March 09, 2020 @02:00AM (#22523301)
There's https://www.netlifycms.org/ if you want a static site generator with a CMS, FYI.
Re:Websites have evolved back to static HTML/CSS/JS files by hanniabu on Monday March 09, 2020 @02:17AM (#22523366)
Are you aware of any open source applications as a CMC for static generators like Jekyll? Would be very convenient to have one with a a simple github login/auth settings page and then add/edit page/post options and the ability to select or upload a theme would be great.
Re:Websites have evolved back to static HTML/CSS/JS files by petepete on Monday March 09, 2020 @03:05AM (#22523516)
NetlifyCMS works with Jekyll, Hugo, Gatsby, Middleman and a few others.

https://www.netlifycms.org/docs/jekyll/

Re:Websites have evolved back to static HTML/CSS/JS files by 6510 on Monday March 09, 2020 @02:21AM (#22523381)
my photographer friend can use ftp
Re:Websites have evolved back to static HTML/CSS/JS files by 6510 on Monday March 09, 2020 @07:24AM (#22524515)
my photographer friend can also add <img> tags to static html documents.