Re:Coronavirus: the second-weirdest solution?
by tyingq on Saturday March 07, 2020 @08:08AM
(#22511372)
I'm confused. If you don't want people to touch a railing, why have a railing?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Coronavirus: the second-weirdest solution?
by Grazester on Saturday March 07, 2020 @08:37AM
(#22511472)
If I am running down stairs in the subway I hover my hand above them without touching it in case I need something to hold onto in the event I trip.
I will not want to be the guy that dies of a broken neck tumbling down the stairs because I didn't want to touch the hand rail.
Re:Coronavirus: the second-weirdest solution?
by _ph_ on Saturday March 07, 2020 @09:13AM
(#22511600)
And of course, railings are there for a reason. Which is easy to find out, if you ever experience some vertigo, some muscle or back problems or just get a bit older :p
Re:Coronavirus: the second-weirdest solution?
by hditorkeif on Saturday March 07, 2020 @08:48AM
(#22511512)
For safety reasons. For disabled people.
Last year I twisted my ankle and for a few days the only way I could use flight of stairs was to held onto the rails.
Re:Coronavirus: the second-weirdest solution?
by tyingq on Saturday March 07, 2020 @10:51AM
(#22512133)
Well, yes, but the context is that a railing covered with a layer of sticky crap isn't much better than no railing.
Re:Coronavirus: the second-weirdest solution?
by alphabettsy on Saturday March 07, 2020 @08:20AM
(#22511416)
They’re generally required by law, even at your house, but especially in public places.