News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Simple Systems Have Less Downtime by ailideex on Tuesday March 03, 2020 @05:49PM (#22479481)
> compile it from source

Way simpler to do on Linux than M$ Windows.

> [no way to ] to directly distribute binaries without a gigantic fucking headache.

I mean, flatpak, appimage, docker, etc ...

Re:Simple Systems Have Less Downtime by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Wednesday March 04, 2020 @09:14AM (#22483896)
> Way simpler to do on Linux than M$ Windows.

Completely unnecessary on Windows since it is an operating system, not a kludge of random source code from the internet.

> I mean, flatpak, appimage, docker, etc ...

Which of those is ubiquitous enough to ensure availability of what you're looking for in that format? In my experience: none of them. AppImage is easily the best, but the community seems to hate it because it makes things too flexible and simple or something.

Re:Simple Systems Have Less Downtime by ailideex on Wednesday March 04, 2020 @10:26AM (#22484502)
> Way simpler to do on Linux than M$ Windows.

Where, pray tell, do people who write the software for this "operating system" store their source code if not somewhere that is connected to the internet? Do they use punch cards?

> Which of those is ubiquitous enough to ensure availability of what you're looking for in that format?

Have not met someone who hates AppImage. flatpak is also rather ubiquitous. I use both every day.

Re:Simple Systems Have Less Downtime by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Wednesday March 04, 2020 @11:07AM (#22484896)
> Have not met someone who hates AppImage

Talk to Drew DeVault, to name one.