Some alledge that the NDB/FIS (Federal Intelligence Service) knew about the operation. [1]
> The criminal case should be against the company executives surely, not "persons unknown".
At this point, it is not known who was involved in what way exactly. Some executives? Definitely. All executives? Maybe not.
A former employee believes that only 2-3 executives knew about the whole scheme and maybe 10-15 technicians put two and two together or suspected something. [2]
[1] https://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/geheimdienstaffaere-cryptole... (german)
[2] https://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/17-jahre-bei-der-crypto-ag-e... (german)
I don't know about Switzerland, but in some European countries this enables a judge to be designated to carry out a formal investigation and to then decide who to specifically go after. In addition, filing a complaint against a specific person opens you to be sued back if that person is then shown to have done nothing wrong. This means that it is very common for criminal complaints to be initially filed against "persons unknown".
This should be embarrassing for the Swiss intelligence services whose job it was to detect and prevent these sorts of shenanigans...
Also, have I misunderstood? The criminal case should be against the company executives surely, not "persons unknown". Or is that just to include whoever bribed them?