News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Windows93 by arexxbifs on Monday March 02, 2020 @11:37AM (#22465934)
The nice thing about running Linux is that my FVWM config looks pretty much the same now as it did in 1995, bitmapped fonts and all. Can't improve on perfection.
Re:Windows93 by dghughes on Monday March 02, 2020 @04:17PM (#22469093)
In the 90s I used FVWM on Red Hat v1 and it was confusing to me. It's like looking at your desktop through high-powered binoculars from two feet away.
Re:Windows93 by asveikau on Monday March 02, 2020 @06:38PM (#22470314)
It was a very configurable window manager, so I am sure with some study you could have adjusted the distance of the binoculars.
Re:Windows93 by anthk on Monday March 02, 2020 @09:25PM (#22471282)
I think he run it under a VirtualDeskop mode, where its physical screen would be smaller than the X11 video mode, thus, having to scroll up and down to show the full Fvwm Pages.
Re:Windows93 by asveikau on Monday March 02, 2020 @11:27PM (#22471777)
Thanks, I had forgotten that mode, but I remember it now.

In those days as I recall setting X to work at a good resolution was sometimes much more painful than it had to be. Since the 2000s (after the fork to Xorg for example) autoconfig got a lot better. I seem to recall it was possible to trigger a config that would give you a very low physical resolution but high res virtual desktop.

Re:Windows93 by asveikau on Monday March 02, 2020 @12:19PM (#22466418)
I recently started using fvwm again on one machine in some kind of exercise in nostalgia. Holds up surprisingly well.