News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How the 1918 Flu Spread Across America (2017) by danso on Friday February 28, 2020 @12:28PM (#22444440)
I read this article a few weeks ago when I fell down the rabbit hole of trying to figure out why the Spanish Flu was called the "Spanish Flu". I knew it didn't originate from Spain, but hadn't heard that the traditional consensus is that it likely started in Kansas, owing to the first detected case being in Kansas.

The CDC has a variety of history pages [0] about the Spanish Flu. The main one acknowledges that there isn't a "universal consensus" about the virus's origin, but doesn't assert any of the other alternative explanations.

The theories that the Spanish Flu might have actually come from China seem to be more recent. Such as this one in 2014 [1] that found reports from 1917 of Chinese suffering Spanish Flu like symptoms. But his explanation for how the first known case in the West was in Kansas – that thousands of Chinese workers were sent to labor around the world – seems really speculative.

Given that there isn't compelling evidence to think the Spanish Flu started elsewhere outside of Kansas, it is funny how not only did it get the name of "Spanish Flu", but also that Kansas managed to not have a long-lasting reputation for terrible disease, even though the Spanish Flu killed more people than (IIRC) all the other 20th century pandemics combined.

[0] https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/1918-commemoratio...

[1] https://www.history.com/news/china-epicenter-of-1918-flu-pan...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu

Re:How the 1918 Flu Spread Across America (2017) by NikolaeVarius on Friday February 28, 2020 @12:39PM (#22444543)
I don't think the Kansas source has any traditional consensus at all. It's just on the list of "possibilities" None of the sources indicate otherwise.
Re:How the 1918 Flu Spread Across America (2017) by danso on Friday February 28, 2020 @01:17PM (#22444950)
Maybe "traditional" is the wrong word; what I meant is that there doesn't seem to have been any discoveries that argue strongly against Kansas being the start of the outbreak. As the submitted article states:

> We cannot say for certain that that happened in 1918 in Haskell County, but we do know that an influenza outbreak struck in January...The report itself no longer exists, but it stands as the first recorded notice anywhere in the world of unusual influenza activity that year.

And later in the article:

> Although some researchers argue that the 1918 pandemic began elsewhere, in France in 1916 or China and Vietnam in 1917, many other studies indicate a U.S. origin. The Australian immunologist and Nobel laureate Macfarlane Burnet, who spent most of his career studying influenza, concluded the evidence was “strongly suggestive” that the disease started in the United States and spread to France with “the arrival of American troops.” Camp Funston had long been considered as the site where the pandemic started until my historical research, published in 2004, pointed to an earlier outbreak in Haskell County.

Re:How the 1918 Flu Spread Across America (2017) by LeoTinnitus on Friday February 28, 2020 @12:36PM (#22444506)
I heard it was called it because the Spanish were the only ones reporting it during the war.
Re:How the 1918 Flu Spread Across America (2017) by smacktoward on Friday February 28, 2020 @12:39PM (#22444542)
Yes, that was the explanation I got in history class as well. The flu emerged during World War I, and every combatant country had strict censorship of the press in place, which suppressed news of its spread in those countries. But Spain was neutral in that conflict and thus had an uncensored press, so reports of the flu's impact quickly made it to print there. And those reports got picked up worldwide as the first reporting on the influenza, leading people to think of it as a disease that began in Spain.
Re:How the 1918 Flu Spread Across America (2017) by lostlogin on Friday February 28, 2020 @12:43PM (#22444578)
This is what the article says.