News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facial recognition company Clearview’s client list stolen... by jjoonathan on Thursday February 27, 2020 @09:33AM (#22433551)
Could the "intruder" have been Joe from sales who came back the night he was laid off using his secondary keycard, which IT hadn't quite gotten around to deactivating yet, and grabbed his old rolodex?
Re:Facial recognition company Clearview’s client list stolen... by at-fates-hands on Thursday February 27, 2020 @10:44AM (#22434226)
I've been at several places where this happened.

I was at a large web dev company where an employee put in his two week notice, then was able to access several of the companies servers and exfiltrate nearly every app or web site they had built in the last two years.

Rumor had it he was using the code to start a dev company on his own and this was the "seed" code that would help him get up and running much faster. AFAIK nothing ever happened to him legally.

Re:Facial recognition company Clearview’s client list stolen... by hermitdev on Thursday February 27, 2020 @12:44PM (#22435631)
I worked for a hedge fund where a quant dev emailed to his gmail a copy of the source for the quant models. He was sued in federal court 4 hours before he was terminated. Criminal charges came around 2-3 months later, IIRC. Once he realized he was fucked, he tried dumping his hard drives in a river. Yes, police diving squad was involved.

Dumbass didn't realize that all SSL traffic was being MITM'd. I never sent any sensitive over personal email from work, being well aware of the practices (also helps to have friends in compliance).

Re:Facial recognition company Clearview’s client list stolen... by htrp on Thursday February 27, 2020 @12:49PM (#22435669)
It's always the dumb ones that get caught?
Re:Facial recognition company Clearview’s client list stolen... by Nuzzerino on Thursday February 27, 2020 @03:33PM (#22437472)
Doesn't the browser display a warning in the case of SSL MITM?
Re:Facial recognition company Clearview’s client list stolen... by cdumler on Thursday February 27, 2020 @05:43PM (#22438780)
Not if the browser has been specifically given the cert. It is typical on corporate networks send all HTTP traffic to a router that acts on behalf of the outside world. If your browser (and browsers these days relying on OS installed certs) has a cert validating the router, it will be legitimate: you have a valid cert for the router you're talking to.

The trick is to use a piece of software that doesn't use your system's certs but has it's own built in, like run Linux in a VM and use that browser. That way, you'll see the MitM attack.

Re:Facial recognition company Clearview’s client list stolen... by spacec0wb0y on Thursday February 27, 2020 @09:38AM (#22433592)
And how was Joe "patched"
Re:Facial recognition company Clearview’s client list stolen... by raxxorrax on Thursday February 27, 2020 @09:59AM (#22433785)
They probably updated his face.
Re:Facial recognition company Clearview’s client list stolen... by reaperducer on Thursday February 27, 2020 @09:41AM (#22433622)
With extreme prejudice.
Re:Facial recognition company Clearview’s client list stolen... by rezgi on Thursday February 27, 2020 @09:44AM (#22433642)
The only way to patch.
Re:Facial recognition company Clearview’s client list stolen... by mindslight on Thursday February 27, 2020 @02:40PM (#22436961)
Hopefully it's a whistleblower. Shaming specific police departments and causing a local political issue is a good way to prevent its adoption.