Yes, or a specific HLA type that is more prevalent in the population.

Is it just me or is your comment really insensitive? I would think that about half of world has no better healthcare system than Iran.

It's you. That half the world has no better healthcare system than Iran is a sad reflection on the state of healthcare in world, not an implication that Iran's dilapidated and overstretched healthcare system\* is a good one. Combine that with their authoritarian government with zero communications skills and no credibility due to being habitual liars, and we should place no stock in their reassurances/projections, and very little stock even in their hard-to-fuck-up stats like # of deaths.

\* I should say this is anecdata, based on comments by several Iranian friends and acquaintances.

I'm not defending Iran's healthcare system. The info I was able to dig up places it as above average, which means that more than 50% of world population will be affected just as bad or worse. Dismissing Iran's data point as not useful takes a specific viewpoint that I consider not empathic enough for my tastes, but everyone is free to disagree.

Iran's healthcare is a lot worse than would be expected for a country of its wealth and development level because of the US embargo.

I don't see the insensitivity. This subject is not something that's very sensitive, I just see the comment as objective.

Why would you think a country under severe sanctions can have a very good health care system?

> half of world

Like he said, severe limitations.