News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Human reproductive cloning: The curious incident of the dog in the night-time. Parent comment

Re:Human reproductive cloning: The curious incident of the d... by chaps on Wednesday February 26, 2020 @12:08PM (#22424914)
Why?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Human reproductive cloning: The curious incident of the d... by agumonkey on Wednesday February 26, 2020 @12:17PM (#22424993)
- the fear of human control over things I consider 'out of line'

- the potential emotions behind the existence of the clone (lost sibling, child) .. heavy

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Human reproductive cloning: The curious incident of the d... by opportune on Wednesday February 26, 2020 @04:20PM (#22427460)
How is the emotional aspect any different than an identical twin besides the age not exactly matching?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Human reproductive cloning: The curious incident of the d... by agumonkey on Wednesday February 26, 2020 @05:46PM (#22428280)
why do people keep bringing up twins..
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Human reproductive cloning: The curious incident of the d... by SketchySeaBeast on Wednesday February 26, 2020 @06:11PM (#22428507)
Because they are naturally occurring clones? Sure, scientists have found some genetic variation, but they are incredibly close.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Human reproductive cloning: The curious incident of the d... by kzrdude on Saturday February 29, 2020 @02:05PM (#22452311)
Creating clones would be interesting because we'd get to know more about the difference between a clone and a twin.
[ Parent | on HN ]