The Guardian doesn't seem to make any comment on that. I would expect his defence lawyer to complain about his conditions no matter what.
The article headlines with thehandcuffs, but the vast majority of the article is nothing to do with that. So honestly no idea on that one; feels like a headline designed to attract attention and maybe spark outrage based on a reader's pre-conceived ideas without actually making any value judgement.
I get it, he's Assange, the state is bad, he's a whipping boy. Probably all true. Really, I think he's going to get a raw deal in this and I think the states involved have really spent too much time and effort chasing something that really won't benefit them, and perhaps not with as much fairness as we'd like.
But the breathless rush with which people run to believe is disconcerting.
https://medium.com/@njmelzer/demasking-the-torture-of-julian...
1. Moved from prison cell to holding cell at prison for transport.
2. Moved from holding cell into transport.
3. Moved from transport into court holding cell.
4. Moved from court holding cell into court.
And reverse equals at least 8. Add in a pretrial meeting with lawyer, and I can see 10 times in a day at court happening, entirely.