Re:The second largest version of Wikipedia is written mostly...
by metalliqaz on Monday February 24, 2020 @07:11PM
(#22409747)
There are many viewpoints. As a counter example, consider the article for one of the topics you mention ("truly of interest to the community"). A user could come across a concept (or person, place, etc.) that they aren't familiar with, click a link, find a short and formulaic but truthful summary, then return to continue reading - all within their own wikipedia. That's useful.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The second largest version of Wikipedia is written mostly...
by _-___________-_ on Monday February 24, 2020 @11:19PM
(#22410885)
How can you ensure that it's truthful? Machine translation garbles meaning all the time.
Re:The second largest version of Wikipedia is written mostly...
by metalliqaz on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @08:29AM
(#22412994)
The bot in question essentially takes a good external database of facts, and populates a stub article with a fill-in-the-blank method. It's not that complicated.