Re:Past Time to Tell the Public:It Will Probably Go Pandemic...
by JoeAltmaier on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @08:49AM
(#22413131)
Note the fatality rate is deaths divided by current infected. But the people dying are those that contracted the disease 4-5 days ago (folks don't die the instant they get sick). So the death rate on folks ultimately reaches nearly double the reported rate?
But draw your own conclusions:
https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.h...
Re:Past Time to Tell the Public:It Will Probably Go Pandemic...
by irq11 on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @09:44PM
(#22419803)
No. This is completely incorrect.
The case fatality rate is the number of deaths divided by confirmed infections. This is what is being reported.
Infection Fatality Ratio changes the denominator to a model for the currently infected population. This is a smaller number, because the denominator is much larger.
There is no mortality metric being reported by reputable sources that is multiples higher than the CFR, as you suggest.
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situati...
Re:Past Time to Tell the Public:It Will Probably Go Pandemic...
by JoeAltmaier on Wednesday February 26, 2020 @03:25PM
(#22426935)
Or, look at the timeline for infection vs eventual fatalities. As I said, draw your own conclusions from the reported data by Johns Hopkins (do they pass the filter for 'reputable'?).
The most useful number I know is, survival chances. How many in 100 stand to be alive say 2 months later. The numbers seem worse than 98, by a good margin. At least worldwide.
The latest numbers from the WHO and the CCDC are an average case fatality rate of 2.3%. This is highly likely to be an overestimate, and the deaths are skewed heavily to the old and infirm.
From the most recent CCDC report [1] those under 40, case fatality was 0.2%. Under 50, 0.4%; under 60, 1.3%.
For those with no pre-existing illnesses, case fatality was 0.9%, across all age groups.
[1]http://weekly.chinacdc.cn/en/article/id/e53946e2-c6c4-41e9-9...