News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:RFC: Let's Disrupt Dating Apps by AndrewKemendo on Monday February 24, 2020 @02:34PM (#22407544)
Even with a 1:1 ratio, 20% of the men would attract 80% of the women. In any dating pool, online or otherwise, the math is just generally bad for the vast majority of men attempting to attract a partner. See:

https://quillette.com/2019/03/12/attraction-inequality-and-t...

Re:RFC: Let's Disrupt Dating Apps by naveen99 on Monday February 24, 2020 @09:12PM (#22410400)
I am skeptical of this much pessimism from the male point of. view. In the op’s post, there is a graph showing women peaking at 60% marriage rate in their 30’s, where as men leave them behind in the 40’s and 50’s. So a good 40% of women aren’t getting their pick of even the bottom 80% of men. i think it’s more like the top 60% of men and women compete for each other and are largely successfully. The bottom 40% of each hold out for as long as they can for the top 60%, and some of them finally succeed (mostly men with accumulated power in middle age).

Also there are pressure release valves. Some people settle for a sexless marriage and simply get sex via prostitution. Men can sometimes find women from poorer countries.

Finally I think what should happen is, make a #singleAndLooking hashtag on twitter and set it on when you are in the market. Let twitter make the hashtag searchable and filterable by city.

Re:RFC: Let's Disrupt Dating Apps by toohotatopic on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @01:16AM (#22411278)
How do you explain the rise of men being married? Is it men dying earlier than women or is it older men being able to marry a younger woman? In the latter case, men are at a disadvantage in the market because some men will take two or more women off the market.
Re:RFC: Let's Disrupt Dating Apps by naveen99 on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @08:49AM (#22413139)
More financial stability with age. They only marry one woman at a time so I don’t understand your last concern.