News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Servers for an Accelerated Future by bluedino on Monday February 24, 2020 @12:49PM (#22406366)
>> For storage, we continue to have ~3TB, but moved to 3x1TB form factor using NVME flash

Are they not using additional storage for caching? I also kind of expected some GPU's for some tasks.

Re:Servers for an Accelerated Future by Hardops on Monday February 24, 2020 @01:58PM (#22407159)
No GPUs, yet.

Yes, the 3TB is 2/3 used for Caching, and 1/3 as a local storage for our SSL/DNS/Firewall/etc.

Re:Servers for an Accelerated Future by anarazel on Monday February 24, 2020 @04:09PM (#22408479)
Is the 2/3 for caching using part of each NVMe, or is there one dedicated for the rest? Mostly wondering about spreading writes more evenly, rather than peak throughout.
Re:Servers for an Accelerated Future by sudhirj on Monday February 24, 2020 @12:59PM (#22406465)
What cache tasks are possible on GPUs? Maybe computing a hash, but that doesn’t seem like a big problem.
Re:Servers for an Accelerated Future by wmf on Monday February 24, 2020 @02:32PM (#22407520)
I could imagine CloudFlare using GPUs for image optimization or video encoding. They do a lot more than caching these days.
Re:Servers for an Accelerated Future by elithrar on Monday February 24, 2020 @10:38PM (#22410732)
Neither is “great” on a GPU:

• Image optimization is still mostly software: JPEG, PNG, WebP. GPUs do not bring much to the table here at all, and consume a lot of power, which is likely to upset the hosting ISP of that cache node.

• Video encoding is better, but still average. NVENC (Nvidia’s encode Engine) has some quality challenges and limitations.

Further, doing this at the edge makes less sense: if you have to fetch the source material from the origin, do the heavy lifting centrally and store the results at the edge. Storing 4-5 renditions is cheap compared to GPU running costs here.

Re:Servers for an Accelerated Future by zoonosis on Monday February 24, 2020 @01:54PM (#22407117)
I think the question about caching was separate from the question about GPUs. I don't think it was meant to imply GPUs for caching.