News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Servers for an Accelerated Future by rasengan on Monday February 24, 2020 @08:36AM (#22403826)
This major shift is well received by the tech community and appears to be an industry wide movement [1]. Looks like meltdown [2] and spectre [3] have run their course.

Bravo to Cloudflare!

[1] https://www.amd.com/system/files/documents/linode-case-study...

[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meltdown_(security_vulnerabi...

[3] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectre_(security_vulnerabil...

Re:Servers for an Accelerated Future by wbl on Monday February 24, 2020 @09:44AM (#22404323)
(Disclosure: I work at Cloudflare but wasn't involved in this decision) Spectre variant 1 still affects patched chips with any sort of speculation and the price of fixing via compiler is substantial. It's a multi vendor structural issue. The hardware industry is stuck with some very unpalatable decisions to fix this. In some cases there are tricks to protect particular arrays but it's very finicky especially if arrays aren't a power of two in length.
Re:Servers for an Accelerated Future by britmob on Monday February 24, 2020 @10:11AM (#22404620)
I wonder when these issues will be far behind us... I can’t imagine it’s very near.
Re:Servers for an Accelerated Future by ksec on Monday February 24, 2020 @10:54AM (#22405093)
>This major shift.....

Intel is still selling as many Xeon as they can make. And AMD's EPYC 2 / Datacenter revenue hasn't move up much relatively speaking.

Not only is it not major by any means, I wouldn't even agree on the word shift.

And that is speaking as someone who really want AMD to do better.

Re:Servers for an Accelerated Future by zoonosis on Monday February 24, 2020 @01:58PM (#22407153)
From 4Q2017 to 4Q2019 AMD's server market share increased from 0.8% to 4.5%[1].

[1] https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-vs-intel-cpu-market-sh...