Re:Safari will no longer trust certs valid for more than 13 ...
by threeseed on Sunday February 23, 2020 @05:19PM
(#22399949)
There is a tangible benefit. For users.
64-bit only, Project Catalyst, BitCode, HTTPS only connections etc are examples of initiatives which definitely has caused pain to developers but has immensely benefited users as a whole. And if you don't passionately care about users then frankly find another platform to develop on.
Re:Safari will no longer trust certs valid for more than 13 ...
by ericd on Sunday February 23, 2020 @05:53PM
(#22400118)
64-bit only certainly doesn't benefit me as a user on the balance. There's a lot of software that's useful that has zero need for yearly updates.
Re:Safari will no longer trust certs valid for more than 13 ...
by kevingadd on Sunday February 23, 2020 @05:50PM
(#22400109)
How does it benefit the user for half their software to break, or for them to have to pay a vendor (rightfully) for a massive update/overhaul just so the software keeps working?
64-bit Only benefits Apple because they don't have to maintain the 32-bit stack anymore. Any perf-sensitive software that needed to be 64-bit transitioned a long time ago.
Re:Safari will no longer trust certs valid for more than 13 ...
by gsich on Sunday February 23, 2020 @05:43PM
(#22400062)
>64-bit only
how has that benefitted the user? Directly and measureably, no "it's 0.3% faster now" excuses.
Re:Safari will no longer trust certs valid for more than 13 ...
by diebeforei485 on Sunday February 23, 2020 @07:15PM
(#22400536)
Not having to load both 32-bit and 64-bit libraries into memory is an efficiency (and battery life) improvement on the system as a whole.
Hopefully their influence doesn't spread to the web too.