There’s also an instructor in every cohort, so your TA (we call them TLs) is more of a first line of defense. We brought in the strongest design students to be TAs which is why they weren’t very much further in the curriculum - in fact they actually had a different curriculum. An exception to the rule caused by curriculum change.
*being taught by someone under a sheet
We brought in contractors to help teach the new curriculum, and one hadn’t adjusted the light in his room for video conferencing and couldn’t see the screen for sunlight, so... improvised. Normally there are weeks of practice lessons and training, so this also the result of a rush.
Someone who hasn't needs to be trained because it's not like a physical classroom at all.
And of course, teachers need to improvise every day, but if they're not used to doing it then they need coaching on that, too.
For example, whenever I teach remotely, I mail a good pair of wired, directional-mic headphones to every student. I also send them PDFs outlining how to position the light in their room.
I do that because they are unfamiliar with the subtleties of remote interaction and it's going to ruin everyone's experience if students have barriers to participation and feedback.
Huh? The guy under the sheet was Christijan Draper, the UX program manager who's been with Lambda School since May 2018. Why are you lying?
* being graded by a student 2 months ahead
* being taught by someone hiding under a sheet
* being paired with a student who hadn't been participating in the curriculum
It seems like there was more going wrong for this student than just a curriculum change.