Re:Peter Norvig's Economic Simulation (2018)
by fizixer on Saturday February 22, 2020 @08:50AM
(#22390987)
> You’re assuming the 4-6% growth is a given ...
I only assumed that to be charitable to OC's argument. If we don't assume that, then OC's criticism of Norvig's simulation assumptions is even more invalid (only slightly so though; it's already invalid enough).
I only assumed that to be charitable to OC's argument. If we don't assume that, then OC's criticism of Norvig's simulation assumptions is even more invalid (only slightly so though; it's already invalid enough).