Re:Discord is not an acceptable choice for free software pro...
by favorited on Friday February 21, 2020 @07:28PM
(#22388446)
> Do you think that a 3rd party should be able to judge and ban you at will for something that you say in a group chat when everyone else in said group chat is fine with it?
Yes. If I were running Discord and learned that there was some Klan group advocating hate against black people, I'd shut it down – even if everyone in that chat was fine with the discussion.
It wouldn't be beneficial to me to have my platform be a host for that content, and it's not beneficial to society for me to facilitate hateful people easily connecting with each other.
Re:Discord is not an acceptable choice for free software pro...
by saagarjha on Friday February 21, 2020 @10:06PM
(#22389134)
The problem is that what's beneficial to society is not always clear-cut.
Re:Discord is not an acceptable choice for free software pro...
by favorited on Friday February 21, 2020 @11:12PM
(#22389376)
Of course, but I'm feeling bold enough to state that the hypothetical Klan-member Discord server would not be beneficial to society.
Re:Discord is not an acceptable choice for free software pro...
by esyir on Saturday February 22, 2020 @12:04PM
(#22392018)
And back then, hypothetical ancient discord would have said the same about homosexuality.
Re:Discord is not an acceptable choice for free software pro...
by dleslie on Friday February 21, 2020 @11:32PM
(#22389435)
It's very simple: unless you're using an E2E encrypted channel with a trusted person, don't say anything in a social platform that you wouldn't say in person to your friends, family and coworkers.
The internet is not private by default; it's public by default.
Do you think that a 3rd party should be able to judge and ban you at will for something that you say in a group chat when everyone else in said group chat is fine with it? I presume that the author of the article is not fine with it, which is why they suggest to avoid discord. What would you do in their place?