Google resists demands from states in digital-ad probe

Re:Google resists demands from states in digital-ad probe by vectorEQ on Friday February 21, 2020 @12:01PM (#22384635)

businesses aren't on trial. it's their owners / directors / responsible parties who are on trial, and those are 'private individuals' - they might be held accountable for their business or business practices, but the idea a business is on trial is silly. and now we know 'people' are actually on trial, it's more logical to say they should be treated as individuals....

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google resists demands from states in digital-ad probe by CaptainZapp on Friday February 21, 2020 @09:57PM (#22389104)

> businesses aren't on trial. it's their owners / directors / responsible parties who are on trial, and those are 'private individuals'

While it's very rare that a company is on trial it does happen. Partially in rather prominent cases[1]

There is such a thing as a corporate death penalty.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Andersen

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google resists demands from states in digital-ad probe by dang on Friday February 21, 2020 @11:31PM (#22389431)

(Totally unrelated, but I've added ">" to the start of your comment so it didn't get formatted as code and thus break the layout of the page. Not your fault - this is a bug of ours. Perhaps the most commonly complained about bug.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google resists demands from states in digital-ad probe by CaptainZapp on Saturday February 22, 2020 @02:54AM (#22389918)

Thanks Dan,

I'll try to adhere to it when quoting in the future.

It's just that I always thought that courier font looks so cool for quoting.

But at the end of the day it should be legible, without scrolling around.

[ Parent | on HN ]