Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by echelon on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @08:35PM
(#22372015)
To be fair, this is the CEO personally reaching out. I think that's beyond awesome.
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by jader201 on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @09:53PM
(#22372316)
While it’s nice to hear more context in response to the OP’s criticisms, I’m not sure I would consider a response mostly defending the criticisms “beyond awesome”.
Most tech startups know the influence HN has, and to respond to a top post with a mostly defensive stance (vs. the OP points actually having an impact on the decisions being made) is a smart move on the part of the CEO (I would probably do the same thing).
Just saying I wouldn’t have used the words “beyond awesome”.
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by dontdoitpls on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @10:12PM
(#22372384)
Yeah this is damage control.
I recommended stripe to a friend because a hn (ad?) That mentioned the documentation was great. He struggled and I couldn't help him without a deep dive.
To be fair, my WordPress website has no problem with stripe.
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by NicoJuicy on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @10:32PM
(#22372469)
Damage control? The person is giving facts back.
That is the exact idea why they receive a notification when you mention Stripe ;).
Ps. I didn't have any problems with Stripe also, documentation was top notch
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by iratewizard on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @10:39PM
(#22372498)
I've got to disagree on the stripe documentation. They set the bar for exemplary documentation.
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by NicoJuicy on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @10:49PM
(#22372536)
> That mentioned the documentation was great
;)
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by iratewizard on Tuesday February 25, 2020 @02:17PM
(#22416283)
Whoops, I completely misunderstood your post.
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by pc on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @08:34PM
(#22372008)
You're right! (Though I am.) I edited the comment.
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by StavrosK on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @08:54PM
(#22372104)
Agreed, that phrase strikes me as without intrinsic meaning (though I can't say I ever grasped the meaning of "sorry" in the non-apology sense). It always seems to me like the person wants to say something that appears comforting without actually meaning anything, and seems disingenuous.
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by EpicEng on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @09:20PM
(#22372197)
>It always seems to me like the person wants to say something that appears comforting without actually meaning anything, and seems disingenuous.
reply
And most importantly, without admitting fault.
Re:Stripe refunds: fees from the original charge are not ret...
by crusader76 on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @10:31PM
(#22372464)
I think it’s an Irish thing, we’re always apologising for something! :)
We should all delete "I'm sorry you feel that way" from our mental phrasebooks. It is a phrase that always falls flat, comes across as potentially sarcastic, and is the textbook definition of a non-apology apology.
If you want to clarify something, go for it. If you don't want to apologize, don't feel obligated to do so. But please, for your own benefit, steer clear of this no-good phrase.