News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bloomberg bankrolls a social-media army by JMTQp8lwXL on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @05:07PM (#22370617)
It would be relieving to see this effort fail. The popularity of platforms should be based on the merit of the ideas, not money spent.
Re:Bloomberg bankrolls a social-media army by irq11 on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @06:17PM (#22371189)
Or maybe people like Bloomberg because of his policies and positions, and concluding that it’s simply because of money is a logical fallacy.
Re:Bloomberg bankrolls a social-media army by JMTQp8lwXL on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @06:36PM (#22371312)
That doesn't mirror how primary voters actually rank candidates. Polling shows that many voter's first preference and second preference are often ideologically different -- you might have a primary voter who's 1st pick is a centrist democrat, and 2nd pick is socialist democrat, and vice versa.
Re:Bloomberg bankrolls a social-media army by irq11 on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @06:40PM (#22371336)
So? That simply means that voters like inconsistent things. Or that your labels aren’t sufficient to capture their preferences.