Ok but I'm saying even with these rules wealthy people will have an advantage in many ways. Funding for a campaign is just one element of an elite wealthy candidates advantages, this guy has his own press and no one can do anything about that. But like I also said I agree that in an ideal system it's a pure mertirocracy for the jobs qualifications, that in practice is very hard to get though.

It would be relieving to see this effort fail. The popularity of platforms should be based on the merit of the ideas, not money spent.

Or maybe people like Bloomberg because of his policies and positions, and concluding that it’s simply because of money is a logical fallacy.

That doesn't mirror how primary voters actually rank candidates. Polling shows that many voter's first preference and second preference are often ideologically different -- you might have a primary voter who's 1st pick is a centrist democrat, and 2nd pick is socialist democrat, and vice versa.

So? That simply means that voters like inconsistent things. Or that your labels aren’t sufficient to capture their preferences.