San Francisco Wants to Tax Your Stock Options

Re:San Francisco Wants to Tax Your Stock Options – All of Them by gojomo on Friday February 18, 2011 @02:12PM (#2236770)

Having researched Non-Qualified Stock Options (NQSOs) a bit more since writing the above, I've learned that for NQSOs, companies are expected to do tax withholding at the time of option exercise, even collecting money (beyond the exercise price) from the exerciser as necessary. This is in expectation of the exerciser's ordinary-income liability for the spread-at-exercise.

That's somewhat like the reasoning of the SF payroll law – though the tax/withholding is from the funds of, and for the liability of, the (possibly-former) employee, rather than the company itself. Still, the SF law is more analogous to current treatment of NQSOs than I'd realized, using the same spread that generates employee ordinary income tax as the basis for the company payroll tax.

So not quite as unprecedented and insane as I'd thought, though still a mess for startups compared to less-taxing jurisdictions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:San Francisco Wants to Tax Your Stock Options – All of Them by tungwaiyip on Friday February 18, 2011 @04:13PM (#2237295)

Yes, every time I exercise NQSO, a paystub is sent to me and tax is withheld. I also get a paystub when exercising ISO, although no tax is withheld. It is actually more chore for me because I need to keep track of the gain and send estimated tax (I only do same day sale, the only sane option in my opinion). The article is very misleading to imply stock option is tax free. Techcrunch never grant her any stock option I figure.

[ Parent | on HN ]