News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on New AMD EPYC-based Compute Engine family, now in beta. Parent comment

Re:New AMD EPYC-based Compute Engine family, now in beta by darkwater on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @04:20AM (#22364102)
I do not agree, and it is not my experience.Mind you that I've always worked in small/mid-sized businesses (50-300 employees) and basically every service has someone needing it for their daily work. Sure, they may live without it for some times, but you will make their lives more miserable.

And anyway if you already have all in place to completely rebuild every SPOF machine from scratch in a few hours, go the extra mile and make it an active/passive cluster, even manually switched, and make the downtime a minutes thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:New AMD EPYC-based Compute Engine family, now in beta by aidenn0 on Thursday February 20, 2020 @11:59AM (#22376467)
A small amount of work over a long period of time (i.e. setting up a redundant system) may be worse than losing a large amount of work in a short period of time.

Single machines just don't fail that often. I managed a database server for an internal tool and the machine failed once in about 10 years. It was commodity hardware, so I just restored the backups to a spare workstation and it was back up in less than 2 hours. 15 people used this service and they could get some work done, without it, so there was less than 30 person-hours of productivity lost. If I spent 30 hours getting failover &c. working for this system over a 10 year period, it would have been more hours lost for the company than the failure caused.

[ Parent | on HN ]