News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On Design Thinking by cgio on Tuesday February 18, 2020 @03:19AM (#22354352)
The irony ... in order to solve for the stakeholder’s assumed problem statement, the advice was to avoid assumptions...all assumptions, I assume, except the assumptions of the report.

From the article

> They prototyped and tested solutions to municipal problems. Finally, in collaboration with the Blue Ribbon Committee, the IDEO team published a report. It aimed to address the problem—an absence of “competitiveness” for new business and talent—that Mayor Braddy had diagnosed.

And further down the article from the report itself:

> (“Instead of assuming,” for instance, “that the right answer to dealing with trees cut as a result of development is a policy to limit the amount of trees that can be cut, why not ask the question, ‘How can we maintain a desirable degree of shade and tree coverage as part of Gainesville’s overall design?’”)

Re:On Design Thinking by meristem on Tuesday February 18, 2020 @10:50AM (#22356862)
From a human factors engineering POV, this is straight usability research. Instead of assumptions, use observations and interviews— then form problem statements. Instead of a single solution, form ‘how’ statements about intent. In Product Management parlance: speak in terms of problems, not solutions. The design cycle then moves to create product/refine product.
Re:On Design Thinking by cgio on Wednesday February 19, 2020 @05:22PM (#22370739)
Don’t disagree. It reads like they didn’t eat their dog food though.