Facebook asks for a moat of regulations it already meets

Re:Facebook asks for a moat of regulations it already meets by quietbritishjim on Tuesday February 18, 2020 @02:17AM (#22354127)

It could certainly run with 20 staff – it would just spend a lot of money on license fees to a separate Facebook Services Inc that provides software and server administration services. This is similar to how companies avoid tax e.g. IKEA and Starbucks.

It could similarly avoid large profits but avoiding large revenues works be trickier. But I'm not an expert in these things, so maybe it's possible if you really know what you're doing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook asks for a moat of regulations it already meets by fastball on Tuesday February 18, 2020 @03:05AM (#22354295)

Then you just base it off of the number of employees overall in the parent company, not the number of employees in the subsidiary.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook asks for a moat of regulations it already meets by quietbritishjim on Tuesday February 18, 2020 @04:21AM (#22354607)

The problem is, there's no legal distinction between a company that own shares but is "really" part of the same company, vs a completely separately company owning shares e.g. a pension fund.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Facebook asks for a moat of regulations it already meets by pyrale on Tuesday February 18, 2020 @03:59AM (#22354525)

Base it off user count too, problem solved.

[ Parent | on HN ]