Re:The Myth of the Myth of the 10x Programmer
by JackFr on Monday February 17, 2020 @05:56PM
(#22351729)
I think a good portion of the story there was thorough knowledge of prior art, the ability to identify what was essential and what was incidental and the fact that he built on a singular vision.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Myth of the Myth of the 10x Programmer
by ivalm on Monday February 17, 2020 @07:54PM
(#22352462)
Sure, but none of those things were monopolized by Linus. Other teams/engineers could have done the same, tried to do the same.
Re:The Myth of the Myth of the 10x Programmer
by jodrellblank on Monday February 17, 2020 @09:49PM
(#22353052)
How do you know they didn’t do the same or better? Linus has the advantage of a huge audience (of adoring fans, no less), there were competing dvcs’s at the time - mercurial, bazaar, darcs - and likely many more in companies and lone developer machines which weren’t successful.
If Linus had released Git quietly, but put his name behind mercurial and used it for the Linux kernel, would Git still be the de-facto standard today? Or is his popularity and influence at least as big a factor as his design or code skills?
Re:The Myth of the Myth of the 10x Programmer
by hnews_account_1 on Monday February 17, 2020 @10:10PM
(#22353122)
Regardless of the success of git, it's novel branching tech was what set it apart. And he did beat entire teams of coders to that solution. Of course his name was what lent it so much credence, but a good solution tends to make waves in online communities. Best example? Bitcoin.