Re:SpaceX launches more Starlink satellites, misses booster ...
by 8bitsrule on Monday February 17, 2020 @10:06PM
(#22353110)
"Albedo" sounds like visible light. That's fine for those guys. Then there's x-ray and above, and infrared- and radio- below. Doubt they'll be able to make those sats soak up all EM radiation. And a few thousand of them will also be bouncing ground-based signals back down in all directions ... forget about isolation from earth-based sigs in basins.
I don't recall any beforehand news of this being publicly discussed.
Re:SpaceX launches more Starlink satellites, misses booster ...
by ForHackernews on Monday February 17, 2020 @03:38PM
(#22350505)
"Funding secured."
Re:SpaceX launches more Starlink satellites, misses booster ...
by bpodgursky on Monday February 17, 2020 @03:48PM
(#22350593)
I don't think TSLA would have a lot of trouble securing their $420 funding, given the current $800 stock price.
Re:SpaceX launches more Starlink satellites, misses booster ...
by hawaiianbrah on Monday February 17, 2020 @06:05PM
(#22351783)
That’s missing the point completely.
> @elonmusk: albedo will drop significantly on almost every successive launch