Re:FAA faces dilemma over 737 Max wiring flaw that Boeing mi...
by kds3 on Sunday February 16, 2020 @05:59PM
(#22344269)
Runaway Stabilizer / MCAS cases can be mitigated by the pilots (they can use cutoff switches and do manual trim), but not this kind of electrical short:
> Furthermore, the electrical power in that wire could circumvent the cutoff switches in the cockpit that, in the event of such a stabilizer runaway, are used to kill electrical power to the tail. Theoretically, the pilots could be unable to shut it off.
Re:FAA faces dilemma over 737 Max wiring flaw that Boeing mi...
by mlyle on Sunday February 16, 2020 @06:15PM
(#22344323)
It's not a great mitigation, but the last thing on runaway stabilizer's memory list is to "grasp and firmly hold" the stab trim wheel.
Re:FAA faces dilemma over 737 Max wiring flaw that Boeing mi...
by SAI_Peregrinus on Sunday February 16, 2020 @06:44PM
(#22344457)
The electric motors can apply more power than a human can resist. So that's not exactly helpful.
Re:FAA faces dilemma over 737 Max wiring flaw that Boeing mi...
by mlyle on Monday February 17, 2020 @12:45PM
(#22349214)
The system is engineered so that an operator holding the trim wheel wins, via a clutch mechanism.
Re:FAA faces dilemma over 737 Max wiring flaw that Boeing mi...
by userbinator on Sunday February 16, 2020 @07:43PM
(#22344697)
I believe there is a clutch mechanism. There are videos on YouTube of pilots doing this (in a simulator.)
This is the same memory item Boeing thought would mitigate MCAS, since that is essentially a runaway stabilizer trim, although in retrospect behaving in a very different manner making it much harder to diagnose.
[1]: http://www.b737.org.uk/runawaystab.htm