A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro exceeds the FCC's limit

Re:A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro ex... by Shikadi on Friday February 14, 2020 @03:20PM (#22330010)

I think this is a semantic argument... If 100 independent scientists reproduce results, those results themselves are a scientific consensus, are they not?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro ex... by craftinator on Saturday February 22, 2020 @04:49PM (#22393568)

Yes, at that point the political consensus adopts the results of rigorous scientific testing as it's new bling

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro ex... by ColanR on Friday February 14, 2020 @04:14PM (#22330457)

Insofar as it's a semantic argument, it's irrelevant.

> If 100 independent scientists reproduce results, those results themselves are a scientific consensus

Not in any sense that's relevant to the discovery of new information or its verification.

[ Parent | on HN ]