Re:California’s housing crisis: how a bureaucrat pushed to b...
by bluGill on Friday February 14, 2020 @03:09PM
(#22329884)
Sure it will. Housing is about compromises. If you can rent a 3 bedroom apartment for $900/month would you pay $9000/month (plus taxes and insurance) to buy a house?
The above numbers are realistic. You have a choice to nice 3 bedroom apartments for $900/month in the Des Moines Iowa area. The payments on a 30 year loan for a 2 million dollar house are a bit over 9000/month.
Re:California’s housing crisis: how a bureaucrat pushed to b...
by bradlys on Friday February 14, 2020 @04:26PM
(#22330558)
Your comparison doesn't make sense. You're conflating multiple variables.
Re:California’s housing crisis: how a bureaucrat pushed to b...
by bluGill on Monday February 17, 2020 @07:48AM
(#22347287)
I'm conflating multiple variables, but the whole is reasonable. If SF would build enough apartments (starting 20 years ago!) it is reasonable to expect that you could rent there for not much more than Des Moines. Given that lack of space in SF - they are not making more land - owning a place will always be more expensive than renting, but high rise apartments amortize the land costs over a lot of people and so it need not be that much per person. Neighborhood is important too: if you are right next to the big jobs centers you should expect to pay more (in Des Moines downtown apartments run $2000 for a 2 bed room - they have just started building them though so I expect that price to come down in 10 years.)
Realistically, it won't. The new supply will be apartments - not single family homes. It's not like people will all want to sell and move into apartments or that the desire for homes will go down. It just means competition for apartments will improve.