A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro exceeds the FCC's limit

Re:A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro ex... by AnimalMuppet on Friday February 14, 2020 @11:46AM (#22327993)

You may need to check your math. Inverse square does not fall off faster than exponential.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro ex... by whatshisface on Friday February 14, 2020 @12:01PM (#22328115)

1/x² has a singularity and rises faster than exponential as you approach it. We're talking about getting closer to the source, not further.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro ex... by AnimalMuppet on Friday February 14, 2020 @12:37PM (#22328385)

Ah, I see. In that direction, you are correct.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro ex... by Retric on Saturday February 15, 2020 @05:20AM (#22334402)

It should be obvious that real world antenna don’t behave this way as they are not point sources. But, mathematically you’re correct.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A radio frequency exposure test finds an iPhone 11 Pro ex... by whatshisface on Saturday February 15, 2020 @10:40AM (#22335855)

As you get closer and closer to the surface of the phone, phenomena progress from a visible glow, to pair production, to the thermodynamic stability of quark-gluon plasma.

[ Parent | on HN ]