Re:Usenet – Let's Return to Public Spaces
by chalst on Thursday February 13, 2020 @10:10AM
(#22318270)
Upper bounds on per-user bandwidth would work. Implementing this is nontrivial, but it's an essentially easier problem than spam.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Usenet – Let's Return to Public Spaces
by shadowgovt on Thursday February 13, 2020 @10:34AM
(#22318493)
Upper bounds on per-user bandwidth would help. Though for significant messages, one still has sock-puppet accounts (or aggregates of like-minded individuals with copies of the source message pooling their resources). And, of course, upper bounds create knock-on restrictions (should the system be allowed to transmit public-domain large-volume data? A bandwidth limit blocks that "valid" use too).
It's fun to game-theory how such limits can be broken.
Re:Usenet – Let's Return to Public Spaces
by kick on Thursday February 13, 2020 @10:18AM
(#22318332)
Who cares about piracy? It exists over HTTP, too, and in a far greater volume than a modern USENET-equivalent could ever hope to achieve, and it's not like ISPs need to be sucked up to anymore: they've already taken their ball and went home on this matter, proverbially-speaking.