Toward _FORTIFY_SOURCE Parity Between Clang and GCC

Re:Toward _FORTIFY_SOURCE Parity Between Clang and GCC by pjmlp on Thursday February 13, 2020 @02:45AM (#22316039)

However, because Clang, we have finally IDEs caughting up with Energize C++ and VA for C++ v4 ideas, a couple of decades after they shown what would be possible with C++ when one isn't constrained to UNIX mentality of development.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Toward _FORTIFY_SOURCE Parity Between Clang and GCC by inetknght on Thursday February 13, 2020 @09:49AM (#22318104)

What do you mean?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Toward _FORTIFY_SOURCE Parity Between Clang and GCC by pjmlp on Thursday February 13, 2020 @11:21AM (#22318906)

I mean this,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQQTScuApWk

http://dreamsongs.com/Files/Energize.pdf

http://www.edm2.com/index.php/VisualAge_C%2B%2B_4.0_Review

Basically Smalltalk like development experience, just for C++. Too advanced for early 90's computers (it demanded very high end hardware).

[ Parent | on HN ]