Re:No person who was born blind has ever been diagnosed with...
by laszlokorte on Wednesday February 12, 2020 @12:29PM
(#22310728)
I once helped setting an article in tex (originally written in word) and made the mistake of not noticing that rich text 10^20 got converted to 1020 in plain text. We only noticed post print but nobody else seem to have stumbled on it even though it was at the core of the articles thesis.
Re:No person who was born blind has ever been diagnosed with...
by mennis16 on Wednesday February 12, 2020 @09:07AM
(#22308891)
They also used the 2 in 10,000 figure when picking out the comparison syndromes. I believe Retts is ~1 in 10,000. It's definitely not 1 in a million.
Re:No person who was born blind has ever been diagnosed with...
by HourglassFR on Wednesday February 12, 2020 @09:15AM
(#22308944)
My guess is the editor somehow messed up the per thousand sign ‱
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basis_point
edit: My bad. Correct character, incorrect description. It is indeed "ten thousand".
Re:No person who was born blind has ever been diagnosed with...
by jfk13 on Wednesday February 12, 2020 @10:17AM
(#22309437)
Somewhat ironically, I think you're off by one character here.
Unicode U+2031 ‱ is actually the per ten thousand sign (check its character name).
Unicode U+2030 ‰ is the per thousand (or "per mille") sign.
Still it should definitely be corrected as the 2 out of 10,000 is a value that sticks in the mind.