Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in...
by safety-third on Friday February 07, 2020 @05:55PM
(#22272032)
I dislike pseudocode. I make candidates use an actual language because it smoke checks the ones who put X years of Y language. I don't demand perfection, just that the general shape be there.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in...
by perl4ever on Saturday February 08, 2020 @12:23AM
(#22274099)
Unlike some people, I'd be happy to spend a few hours over a few days writing some code for free in peace and tranquility. If I didn't have a job already, I'd be happy to prove myself for six months as a temp. I have never been in either situation and not excelled.
Why should this be inadequate to demonstrate technical skills?
Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in...
by celticmusic on Friday February 07, 2020 @11:03PM
(#22273766)
Which would punish people like me who will work across 3-4 languages daily and therefore often forget or confuse which library call does what in what language.
Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in...
by ProZsolt on Saturday February 08, 2020 @01:04PM
(#22277257)
Same here. Sometimes I forgot how to define a class method. Is it def? Is it func?
I can write Rubyish, Goish, Pythonish or PHPish pseudocode, but the syntax will be only 90% correct. I remember distinguishing features(like Ruby blocks), but features that all language has always a blur.