Re:Angular 9.0
by qwerty456127 on Friday February 07, 2020 @05:21AM
(#22264656)
Doesn't opinionated and professionally engineered structure mean "better"? Clearly most of the JS coders don't have expertise sufficient to engineer their structures professionally on their own - isn't it better to embrace a professionally engineered structure done for you for free?
> Doesn't opinionated and professionally engineered structure mean "better"?
No, if it's overengineered.
Re:Angular 9.0
by ChicagoDave on Saturday February 08, 2020 @12:05AM
(#22274028)
If you have a corporate web app the connects to dozens of secure services, an opinionated framework specifically designed to manage that well is not “over engineered”.
Conversely, if your web app has one api to call, you may find an opinionated framework to be a rocket engine where only a lawn mower engine is required.
Re:Angular 9.0
by ChicagoDave on Saturday February 08, 2020 @12:07AM
(#22274037)
No. It means suitable to larger complex systems. Possibly unnecessary for smaller projects.
There’s no good or bad. As in any architectural adoption, it should’ve based on your team’s capabilities and support capabilities.
Experience matters too. There are good reasons to use either platform.