News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in... by mrfusion on Thursday February 06, 2020 @06:51PM (#22261730)
You should produce it in “I feel” phrases. That makes it known that it’s your opinion and could be wrong. Treat it like couples therapy.
Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in... by SpicyLemonZest on Thursday February 06, 2020 @07:52PM (#22262155)
The challenge isn't figuring out how you or I personally would deliver feedback, given time to plan it out and a good set of feedback to deliver. The challenge is establishing a process that ensures everyone at the company will always do it, even when the real reason is something like "meh I'm not sure the candidate quite clears our bar".
Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in... by taneq on Thursday February 06, 2020 @08:04PM (#22262227)
> even when the real reason is something like "meh I'm not sure the candidate quite clears our bar".

That's the problem, though - you're trying to make a hiring decision on hopelessly incomplete information, and so it will come down in large part to gut feeling. And the moment you admit to using some non-quantifiable feeling as a basis for not hiring someone, you open yourself up to claims of some form of discrimination.

It's all around safest to just stay quiet.

Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in... by mc3 on Thursday February 06, 2020 @08:05PM (#22262235)
My internal translation: "I feel" -> "I have concluded, based on no evidence"
Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in... by rimliu on Friday February 07, 2020 @05:43AM (#22264778)
Or, alternatively, based on intuition. Which, in many cases, is an internalized experience.
Re:No engineer has ever sued because of constructive post-in... by pgwhalen on Thursday February 06, 2020 @07:02PM (#22261795)
That in no way solves the problem though, it just makes it ever so slightly less likely to happen.