Re:January 2020 warmest on record: EU climate service
by titzer on Wednesday February 05, 2020 @06:15AM
(#22245818)
> You honestly don't understand how naive you are.
I don't hang around hackernews to get insulted. It's not what we do around here.
Re:January 2020 warmest on record: EU climate service
by 1propionyl on Wednesday February 05, 2020 @06:20AM
(#22245836)
I don't hang around HN to have every other commenter confirm my existing opinions either.
Being told by someone that they think you're wrong isn't an insult.
If you buy the reassuring yet nonsensical idea that "the humans are fucked, the planet will be fine", you can be adequately classified as cherry-picking a minimally discomfiting worldview, against all evidence. That's not an insult.
Re:January 2020 warmest on record: EU climate service
by scarejunba on Wednesday February 05, 2020 @06:50AM
(#22245957)
There’s a lot of very low brow discussion going on here so I understand why you’re frustrated. HN does tone police, though, so if you want to participate probably best to play along.
The necessary reactions to make a photosynthetic carbohydrate production chemical pathway energetically feasible actually only exist within extremely narrow temperature bounds.
You honestly don't understand how naive you are. You're disguising hope by what sounds vaguely scientific.
Not to mention: exactly where do you think those temperate zones will exist?