Things I Believe About Software Engineering

Re:Things I Believe About Software Engineering by AJRF on Monday February 03, 2020 @09:53AM (#22224595)

> "Read the classics. So many “new” ideas in software development have actually been around for decades."

From the original post that inspired this post: https://gist.github.com/stettix/5bb2d99e50fdbbd15dd9622837d1...

What would HN say are the "classics"?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Things I Believe About Software Engineering by stronglikedan on Monday February 03, 2020 @10:27AM (#22224941)

I don't know if it's a "classic", but I recently picked up a copy of Wicked Problems, Righteous Solutions: A Catalogue of Modern Software Engineering Paradigms [0] after reading through another HN thread on good software dev books. I haven't cracked it open yet though.

[0] https://books.google.com/books/about/Wicked_Problems_Righteo...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Things I Believe About Software Engineering by varrock on Monday February 03, 2020 @10:52AM (#22225212)

Can you link the HN thread about good software development books?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Things I Believe About Software Engineering by dschadd on Monday February 03, 2020 @10:21AM (#22224870)

Pragmatic Programmer and Code Complete are usually mentioned as classic programmer text books. I own both and have probably read 10 pages between the 2 books.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Things I Believe About Software Engineering by boring_twenties on Monday February 03, 2020 @01:57PM (#22227588)

I haven't read Code Complete but I did flip it open to a random page around halfway through the book, and was treated to a page-long explanation about the fact that conditions in loops aren't constantly being evaluated, but only once at the top of each loop.

I think it's reasonable to simply assume the entire book is bullshit after that.

[ Parent | on HN ]