News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by Symbiote on Monday February 03, 2020 @03:03AM (#22222309)
"Jaywalking" isn't forbidden in Sweden.

The word "jay" is old American slang for "idiot", and the term was promoted by the car companies to push the blame for accidents onto pedestrians.

Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by Nursie on Monday February 03, 2020 @05:58AM (#22223095)
Nor the UK, where we are told that a pedestrian that is already in the road has "right of way" at all times.

Perhaps they shouldn't be there, but their safety around tons of fast-moving metal is the only important thing at that point.

Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by mrob on Monday February 03, 2020 @06:29AM (#22223262)
"Right of way" in the UK means a legal right to use the road. Pedestrians have right of way on most UK roads (motorways being a notable exception). "Right of way" is sometimes used as slang for "right to proceed first when multiple road users are competing for the same part of the road", but the correct term for this, as used in the Highway Code, is "priority".
Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by chippy on Monday February 03, 2020 @06:37AM (#22223301)
Just to build on this, pedestrians have priority at marked pedestrians crossings of course but also outside of marked crossings when crossing a smaller road where a car is on a main road and is wanting to turn into the smaller road.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/using-the-road-...

"Watch out for pedestrians crossing a road into which you are turning. If they have started to cross they have priority, so give way"

Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by 45ure on Monday February 03, 2020 @12:02PM (#22226105)
>"Right of way" in the UK means a legal right to use the road. Pedestrians have right of way on most UK roads(motorways being a notable exception)

There are distinctions to be made, when it comes to 'Right(s) of way' but your bizarre and daredevil interpretation of what constitutes a legal route for pedestrians and the call to ignore common-sense road security, would only be considered by those who have a death wish.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_way

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-of-way_(transportation)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rights_of_way_in_England_and_W...

Countryside. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countryside_and_Rights_of_Way_...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ramblers

Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by mrob on Monday February 03, 2020 @12:41PM (#22226643)
I said nothing about safety, and made no calls to action.
Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by 45ure on Monday February 03, 2020 @01:07PM (#22227017)
Pedestrians have right of way on most UK roads(motorways being a notable exception

Your open-ended statement implies that legging it across a road is fine, as long as it isn't a motorway. This is not a safe guidance for the uninitiated.

Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by mrob on Monday February 03, 2020 @01:12PM (#22227093)
It implies no such thing, and it is not guidance.
Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by 45ure on Monday February 03, 2020 @01:35PM (#22227346)
Your original statement was emphatic and conveys authority. Perhaps, I misinterpreted your riposte, as an intention to inform the reader.
Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by OJFord on Monday February 03, 2020 @08:37AM (#22223998)
The confusion probably arises because we 'give way' to the higher priority traffic.
Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by mongol on Monday February 03, 2020 @08:27AM (#22223925)
Is "right of way" perhaps a naval term, primarily?
Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by twic on Tuesday February 04, 2020 @01:09PM (#22238853)
Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by BoorishBears on Monday February 03, 2020 @09:17AM (#22224279)
It varies by state, but in Connecticut pedestrians always have right of way, but you can still get a ticket for jaywalking.

It reflects the reality that, while cars should get out of the way of pedestrians, a car can't stop as easily as a human, so you can put yourself in danger by darting out into a street

Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by unishark on Monday February 03, 2020 @09:47AM (#22224523)
I think generally the party who causes the accident is liable for damages in the accident, regardless of who gets a ticket for what they were doing at the time. Though in some states, the driver always pays for the pedestrian's bodily injury. So you need to swerve into anything else you can find (tree, ditch, etc.) to avoid that darting pedestrian.
Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by C14L on Monday February 03, 2020 @07:05AM (#22223449)
Interesting.

Maybe we should call it "jaydriving" when a driver acts entitled and doesn't slow down.

Re:Honk more, wait more: Mumbai traffic police introduce the... by gjm11 on Monday February 03, 2020 @09:13AM (#22224244)
That term (or at least "jay driver") seems to have been in use before "jaywalker" or "jaywalking"!