News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Decentralize Messaging by jacob019 on Friday January 31, 2020 @05:52PM (#22206758)
Perhaps Apple deserves some of the blame here? Is the protocol just too chatty?
Re:Decentralize Messaging by ryukafalz on Friday January 31, 2020 @07:26PM (#22207449)
My understanding is it's because XMPP expects the client to be able to maintain a connection to the server, which is typically not possible on iOS. Apps on iOS are generally not permitted to run in the background, with a few limited exceptions.
Re:Decentralize Messaging by Andrew_nenakhov on Saturday February 01, 2020 @03:16AM (#22209402)
Yes, exactly. And while currently there are ways to maintain a connection to a server on Android, it is clear that the platform is going to restrict this capability even further. Even now, if you run a background process, and start doing some memory-intensive operation, like taking a picture, your app is unceremoniously offloaded from memory, making you unable to receive messages, until the service permits a restart.
Re:Decentralize Messaging by rzzzt on Saturday February 01, 2020 @04:00AM (#22209542)
But one could open and close a desktop XMPP app as well at arbitrary times. What is the difference?
Re:Decentralize Messaging by Andrew_nenakhov on Saturday February 01, 2020 @04:48AM (#22209673)
The difference is control. A person knows that if he disables a desktop client, he won't be receiving any messages.

A phone user expects that messages would be displayed to him in notifications when received. One does not expect to be cut off communications because he had pressed a 'home' button, but it's what happens, and a user does not have any control to prevent it from happening.