Re:The spine of San Francisco is now car-free
by chrisseaton on Thursday January 30, 2020 @10:56AM
(#22192276)
> the streetcars were already in rude health and dying
You can't be both in rude health and dying at the same time! They mean the opposite thing!
Re:The spine of San Francisco is now car-free
by ghaff on Thursday January 30, 2020 @11:02AM
(#22192338)
Rude health isn’t really a common term. I interpreted it as poor health which seems rather obvious from the context. It does appear to actually mean good health but it’s pretty obscure.
Re:The spine of San Francisco is now car-free
by HoustonRefugee on Thursday January 30, 2020 @10:37AM
(#22192071)
GM is already laying the groundwork for the next bailout with their plans to stop building cars, they just don't realize it yet. As for the plan to ban cars from city centers, I am all for that. I want to see mass amounts of money invested in public transit.
Re:The spine of San Francisco is now car-free
by selimthegrim on Thursday January 30, 2020 @10:55AM
(#22192254)
Rude health means good health, not poor.
While it's a decently well-known anecdote, most experts nowadays believe that the very real attempt to monopolize the selling of buses to city transit did not contribute in any significant way to the dismantling of the streetcars--the streetcars were already in rude health and dying, and their rapid dismantling happened even in cities where the bus transit companies were not involved.